Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nick Nowak's avatar

There was some confusion about my interpretation of "sexual misconduct," so I thought more about it in Debatable Insight #7:

Is pornography not a form of sexual misconduct because it does not suit the legal jargon? Is the world sexual confusing? Or misconduct? Can we speak plainly? Or is it ethical to kill a woman for adultery because the law says you may do so? Were any number of atrocities in the course of history moral because of a shortsighted and timid law? You cannot live in the gray areas any more than you can live on the extreme precipices. A path is plain enough. Life is a journey toward clarity. If, like Lao Tzu says, you "have the patience to wait till your mud settles and the water is clear," then these questions will not be so perplexing, and you may finally stop making excuses and start giving your best effort to discover the truth.

No posts

Ready for more?